PV companies in the future or litigation
Pneumatic Telescopic Mast
Pneumatic telescopic mast with power of air source, promote the movement of multicylinder through air compression to lift the mast. Pneumatic telescopic mast industry has experienced a rapid development recently. This mast has been widely used in various fields such as illumination, communication, disaster relief and etc. Due to the features of light loading, general structures, normal maintenance, high security, extreme weather, pneumatic masts have been recognized gradually.
Pneumatic Telescopic Mast,Tower Pneumatic Telescopic Mast,Aluminum Pneumatic Telescopic Mast,Vehicle Mounted Pneumatic Telescopic Mast Yixing Steel Pole International Trading Co., Ltd , https://www.yx-steelpole.com
After the EU's "double-reverse" investigation of China's photovoltaic solar products ended in a mutually acceptable way, China's photovoltaic solar companies have once again encountered lawsuits from US companies. Experts predict that domestic PV companies will face more similar lawsuits in the future. v. Chinese enterprises manipulate prices. 
“Before the US’s PV industry’s 'double anti-' only increased the import tariffs of enterprises, Chinese PV companies still have a certain market share in the US, and ECD’s move is to further crack down on Chinese PV companies.†Wang Xiaokun, a new energy analyst at Zhuochuang Information In an interview with the Economic Herald reporter on the 10th, this is the second US bankruptcy PV company's lawsuit since last year's US bankrupt solar company Solyndra sued the three companies and claimed $1.5 billion.
In last year's lawsuit, Solyndra accused Chinese component manufacturers of forming a cartel monopoly with polysilicon producers, financial institutions and government agencies, enabling components to be sold in the US at below cost, the impact of monopoly behavior in China's PV companies. Next, its operating losses reached $1.5 billion.
Why does the US bankrupt PV company repeatedly sue the Chinese PV giant? Wang Xiaokun told the reporter that the US implementation of the "double opposition" to China's photovoltaic products has not shaken the favorable position of China's PV modules in the United States, and exports to the US are still gradually rising. Some US companies However, due to backward technology and weak price competitiveness, the market was eliminated.
According to public data, Trina Solar's revenue in the United States has increased from 14% to 25.5% in the company's sales share, showing a rapid growth trend. Yingli's revenue in the United States in 2010-2012 reached RMB 1.216 billion, RMB 2.137 billion, and RMB 1.6 billion, respectively. The proportion of the company's sales share rose from 9.7% to 14.1%. Yingli also revealed this year's US market. Sales are expected to achieve explosive growth of 250%.
"This year, the number of new PV installations in the US will reach 5.2GW, and the growth rate will exceed 50%. The newly installed capacity is second only to China. The broad market space attracts Chinese companies." Wang Xiaokun believes that the purpose of the ECD lawsuit is to contain China. Photovoltaic companies are developing in the United States. From "double anti" to "sLR"
Regarding the litigation of US companies, Wang Deyong, a partner of Shandong Kechuang Law Firm, told reporters that although the US has already made a "double-reverse" ruling on Chinese PV products, there are not many cases for individual companies. According to the law enforcement practice of the US courts, the possibility of filing a case is extremely high. Chinese enterprises should actively respond to the lawsuit and resolve it through legal means.
"This case is an infringement lawsuit. In the end, it can be judged as infringement. It depends on whether the prosecution can produce sufficient evidence to prove that it has suffered damage. The US Department of Commerce has already determined that the Chinese company has a 'double-reverse' situation, possibly Will increase the chances of ECD.†Wang Deyong said that this ECD filed an anti-monopoly lawsuit, and the previous “double-reverse†was an anti-dumping and counter-subsidy lawsuit. This case is independent and will not be subject to the “double opposition†incident. Impact.
Bai Ming, deputy director of the International Market Research Department of the International Trade and Economic Cooperation Research Institute of the Ministry of Commerce, and the special commentator of the newspaper, told the reporter that the competition in China's photovoltaic industry is very fierce and it is impossible to form a monopoly organization. Moreover, the decline in the price of China's PV products is the result of technological progress and market competition, as well as purely commercial behavior. It has nothing to do with monopoly, so the ECD's prosecution is not a big deal.
“The period of low-cost winning of Chinese PV companies has ended. At present and in the future, there may be similar cases of similar lawsuits from European and American companies. While actively responding to complaints, enterprises should increase technological innovation and improve product competitiveness. "White Ming suggested.